Repositorio Fedepalma

Where do all the nutrients go?.

Cargando...
Miniatura

Fecha

Título de la revista

ISSN de la revista

Título del volumen

Editor

DOI

Resumen

Descripción

Of the nutrients supplied as fertilisers to an oil palm plantation, only a small fraction of the N and K are exported in palm oil and kernels. This prompts the question of why continued high inputs are necessary. There are known losses, but an important factor appears to be inefficient recycling of nutrients, particularly after replanting. In this paper, data are summarised on the quantity of nutrients in the old stand, the rate at which the nutrients are released after felling, and the requirements of young palms plus cover crop. The comparison shows a vast excess of nutrients in the old stand, even without including fertilisers and EFB mulch given to the young palms. It is not know what happens to this excess of nutrients after replanting, but there is a risk that much is lost. Possibilities for improvising recycling include increasing uptake, by reducing fertiliser and EFB inputs and growing more vigorous cover species, or extending the period of nutrient release by under-planting and by leaving old trunks intact instead of chipping or pulverising. Another option is to transport the old stand residues out of the replant field and use them in place of fertiliser in mature areas. Research on all these aspects would be justified, given the high cost of fertilisers, and the possibility of making considerable savings.
Incluye referencias bibliográficas.
Of the nutrients supplied as fertilisers to an oil palm plantation, only a small fraction of the N and K are exported in palm oil and kernels. This prompts the question of why continued high inputs are necessary. There are known losses, but an important factor appears to be inefficient recycling of nutrients, particularly after replanting. In this paper, data are summarised on the quantity of nutrients in the old stand, the rate at which the nutrients are released after felling, and the requirements of young palms plus cover crop. The comparison shows a vast excess of nutrients in the old stand, even without including fertilisers and EFB mulch given to the young palms. It is not know what happens to this excess of nutrients after replanting, but there is a risk that much is lost. Possibilities for improvising recycling include increasing uptake, by reducing fertiliser and EFB inputs and growing more vigorous cover species, or extending the period of nutrient release by under-planting and by leaving old trunks intact instead of chipping or pulverising. Another option is to transport the old stand residues out of the replant field and use them in place of fertiliser in mature areas. Research on all these aspects would be justified, given the high cost of fertilisers, and the possibility of making considerable savings.

Palabras clave

Reciclaje de nutrientes, Replantación., Palma de aceite

Citación

URI

Colecciones

Aprobación

Revisión

Complementado por

Referenciado por

Con el Apoyo del Fondo de Fomento Palmero

Calle 98 No. 70 - 91 Pisos 14 y 15
Centro Empresarial Pontevedra
PBX: (+57) 601 - 313 8600 Ext. 1500 - 1501
cidpalmero@fedepalma.org

Horario de atención: Lunes a viernes de 8:00am a 12:00am y de 2:00pm a 4:00pm


Sitio en DSpace implementado por:

Desplegado por Biteca